the ontological argument

Fascination with the argument stems from the effort to prove God’s existence from simple but powerful premises. VIEW: Ontological Argument. Is my Argument for Jesus’ Resurrection Question-Begging? Kenneth Einar Himma claimed that omniscience and omnipotence may be incompatible: if God is omnipotent, then he should be able to create a being with free will; if he is omniscient, then he should know exactly what such a being will do … The ontological argument assumes the definition of God purported by classical theism: that God is omnipotent, omniscient, and morally perfect. It is surprise that the book entitled, Classical Apologetics, 1 uses Anselm's 2 Ontological argument in its defense of natural theology. the universe, morality, well-ordered laws of nature, etc. 9 Briefly describe the Ontological Argument 75 100 words The Ontological from MAN 4401 at Eastern Florida State College So the Ontological Argument simply means a logical argument that, if true, argues in favor of the existence of God. Introduction. Many people find it perverse and baffling and accuse it of being circular or not proving anything, but it's a difficult argument to challenge. The Ontological Argument is one of the more recent arguments we consider - it's only 1,000 years old! The Ontological Argument's Weakness. Existence is derived immediately from the clear and distinct idea of a supremely perfect being. As an “a priori” argument, the Ontological Argument tries to “prove” the existence of God by establishing the necessity of God’s existence through an explanation of the concept of existence or necessary being . The ontological argument. Then he argues from those definition premises for the proposition that God exists. Let’s look at … Most arguments for God’s existence start from something we observe in the world that logically infer God as the cause of these observable effects (e.g. Descartes’ ontological (or a priori) argument is both one of the most fascinating and poorly understood aspects of his philosophy. This type of argument, an ‘ontological argument’ is a priori, and deductive. The ontological argument, which proceeds not from the world to its Creator but from the idea of God to the reality of God, was first clearly formulated by St. Anselm (1033/34–1109) in his Proslogion (1077–78). Anselm’s ontological argument proceeds like a geometric proof. The discussion we had is a bit hazy for me now. I am frankly not interested to go back through it, but I recall telling him my basic reasoning for why I thought the Modal Ontological Argument actually ought to lead to the conclusion that God necessarily does not exist. Ontology refers to the study of being, so the ontological argument claims that because God is the kind of being who must exist, therefore, he does exist. Around 2 years ago, I had twitter conversation with John Mark N. Reynolds. Is the Theistic Anti-Realist in a Predicament? He argues that everyone (theist and atheist alike) should agree to some definitions about what God is like. Excellent opening paragraph which brings in the idea of epistemic distance, introduced by John Hick, and hits at an attack on Anselm’s first premise, that God is that which nothing greater can be conceived. Medieval Platonic Monk Anselm produced one, which tries to show that God is ‘de … This is surprising because most classical apologists feel that this is fundamentally an unsound argument. The … ). Although ‘ontology’ sounds like a fancy word, its meaning is actually quite simple: ontology is the study of the nature of being or existing. Of course, the root word of ‘ontological’ is ‘ontology.’.

Loud House Coupe Dreams Full Episode, V Shaped Led Shop Lights, How To Prepare For Inbody Scan, What's Your Flava Dolls, Fuyu No Hanashi Electric Guitar Chord, Tokyo Disneyland 2019, Homemade Custard Recipe South Africa, Suja Immunity Shot Near Me, Cma Exam Fees Philippines, Farm Shop Upton, Sigmarus Runes 2020, Trucor Floor Reviews,